| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
N2XDR
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1 Location: New York
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:48 pm Post subject: Bible Study Group |
|
|
This sounds interesting to me. I am an avid listener of Family Radio on short wave and I also listen to WMCA in New York City. I love being a part of the Shadow Mountain Church services via the internet and streaming video. I currently received an NIV translation Bible from Zondervan and am loving it dearly. Recently I became a child of God and am loving the feeling that the Holy Spirit imparts upon me as it guides me through daily living. I am new in the Church of God and the family of Yoshua/Joshua/Jesus. I read the bible every single day because I need lots of spiritual food/living water. Like Steven and Saul who became Paul, I have a lot of faith and know I will end up in the New Jerusalem when the time comes with the rest of the children of GOD.
Seth
n2xdr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
2E0KAH
Joined: 22 Mar 2009 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all,
I have no issue with a bible study net as such however I do have concerns that I will express in my final paragraph*. I do agree with KD4QFT though that the number of nets are growing to the extent that it is easy to trample unawares on a 'net frequency'. Traditionally Amateur radio is a first come first served basis, so that if a frequency is in use one simply moves to another one. This is not always proving to be the case on CQ100 however as a possessive element seems to have crept in in some cases.
I still like my suggestion (made in another forum) that scheduled public nets are confined to one band (such as 29m perhaps) therefore ensuring that we all know where everyone is. It didn't receive many responses however.
*My concerns are that if one religious group starts a net then other more extreme religious groups who tend to hijack religion for nefarious purposes may feel the need to compete with nets of their own. It would be hard to justify saying no to an Islaamic Jihad net in these circumstances wouldn't it? It is perhaps this and the immotive and controversial nature of religion which has historically put it into the 'never discuss religion, politics or war in public' catergory.
Mild mannered people of good conscience and intent may often find themselves used as pawns in a bigger game by groups with their own agenda. It's a great shame but such is life alas.
Regards,
M6KIM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KC8CDM
Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Posts: 2 Location: Berrien Springs, Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:47 pm Post subject: Anyone interested in starting a Bible Study Net? |
|
|
| This is an old thread but a great idea. I'm interested and willing to help lead it. Let me know if interested here or better yet email be at boblittle68@yahoo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
N2BEW
Joined: 08 Dec 2010 Posts: 8 Location: Valatie, NY
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:11 am Post subject: Re: Anyone interested in starting a Bible Study Net? |
|
|
| KC8CDM wrote: | | This is an old thread but a great idea. I'm interested and willing to help lead it. Let me know if interested here or better yet email be at boblittle68@yahoo.com |
Bob,
Looks like this net never actually started, I think it was just an idea put out there.
I have never heard it over the air.
As far as the old posts about too many nets crowding each other I don't think you have to worry about that at all.
Sadly, as far as I can tell the use of cq100 has declined a lot over the last year since I joined, and there are only a few nets active.
Besides there is plenty of open band width and open frequencies for nets, that is for sure.
If you are interested in leading a bible study net I would say just post when and at what frequency and start it and post the info here.
I will participate if you do.
I honestly don't have time or experience to run it either but would love to take part from time to time.
If you do start it though be aware you probably would not be "helping" to lead it but would be leading it!
Human nature, as you probably well know if you are in a church. People have lots of ideas about how things "aught to be" but very few actually are willing to step up and lead or do anything about it.
That is why I made the comment about not having the time to lead myself. Just being honest. I would like to be involved though.
Maybe I will shoot you an email about it too over the next few days if you don't post anything more here, but I wanted to post to the forum to see if others are still interested too and get this thread active again.
73
Tom
n2bew |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|